PHOTOS: Transbay Transit Center Hardhat Construction Tour

To call the new $4 billion Transbay Transit Center development anything less than spectacular would be a gross understatement. The sheer magnitude and scale of the project is staggering and the cutting edge building and engineering processes being implemented will make your head spin.

The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) which oversees the project, generously offered to give the USGBC’s Northern California Chapter a behind the scenes construction tour, which followed an extremely informative powerpoint presentation.  Due to overwhelming demand, the tour was available only to current members of the USGBC’s Northern California Chapter and registration for the free event closed in less than one day. (Click here for information about joining our chapter.)

Sustainable design and construction is at the center of the project and comes with its own set of challenges due to the size of the development. As Brian Meinrath from environmental design consultant Atelier Ten explained, some laws didn’t even exist to allow some of the things they wanted to do, such as recapturing graywater from sinks to flush toilets. They worked with local government to create standards and permit its use.

The project is truly an engineering marvel requiring unprecedented levels of communication and cooperation amongst firms and agencies.

The project team is clearly world-class and the USGBC’s Northern California Chapter couldn’t be more thankful for their time and expertise. Thanks again!

TJPA: Maria Ayerdi-Kaplan
Transbay PMPC team: Joyce Oishi
Turner Construction: Jack Adams
Atelier Ten: Brian Meinrath
WSP: Wayne Gaw
Integrated Environmental Solutions: Mark Knipfer

The Truth About Green Offices

As a San Francisco-based commercial real estate broker who specializes in helping office tenants create healthier, more energy-efficient work environments, it’s exciting to see the progress we’ve made in moving these issues to the forefront of the discussion.  The moniker “green” has gone from being “hippy”, to trendy, to en vogue, to cliché and now it’s the standard.  Call it what you will, but this framework of thinking is here to stay and will benefit not only us, but generations to follow.

outside

Having said that, and for lack of a better phrase, we need to keep it real and constantly remind ourselves that it’s not the perception of sustainability that matters, but the reality and implementation of it.  To the corporate decision makers that are reading this post, place the health of your employees and the sustenance of our earth first. Healthy employees are intrinsically happy, productive employees, and energy and waste reduction both on-site and within your supply chain directly and positively affects a company’s bottom line; these are facts.  Everyone wins.

I want to share what I feel are the most important decisions you can make when locating and operating your business, from a sustainability perspective.  It doesn’t matter the line of business you’re in, these are principles that can benefit us all.

Location, location, location.

Where you do business is just as important as how you do business.  If an option, give preference to high-density locations where your employees can commute to work via mass transit while eliminating their need to drive somewhere to get lunch or grab a coffee with a client.  Encourage and reward employees who bike or take a bus to work.  There are federal incentives available that can benefit you and your employees such as the Commuter Check program that can save companies up to 10% on their payroll tax expenses while saving their employees up to 40% on their commute costs.

Reduce, reuse, and yes, recycle.

Tearing down the construction of an entire floor in an office tower and building it back up with sustainable materials doesn’t make you “green”.  Too often I see perfectly useful tenant improvements demo’d and sent to a landfill while new resources are acquired and constructed.  Not only does this translate into unnecessary additional expenses for the office tenant, but it puts an unnecessary burden on our earth.  Identify spaces that more closely match your desired configuration, and you’ll reduce construction waste and monetary spending.  They’re out there, it just takes a little more effort.

Think beyond your company.

In addition to making better informed purchasing decisions within your office, are the values and mission of the vendors in your supply chain congruent with your own?  We vote with our purchasing dollars each time we place an order.  You, NOT the supplier, create demand.  Give preference to companies that are also taking pro-active steps to reduce their consumption and waste, such as your office supply vendor.  The market will punish companies that don’t, and reward those that do.  Change starts with you.

Reduce toxicity in the workplace.

Typical office environments have the potential to be highly toxic and can negatively affect the performance, happiness and productivity of your employees.  If you’re a decision maker, you have a responsibility to provide a safe, healthy workplace.  Give preference to properties with operable windows, abundant natural daylight and landlords that use low-voc paints and carpeting.  Segregate copiers in enclosed rooms with adequate ventilation.  Decorate your office with plants that are known to cleanse the air and remove chemical vapors while absorbing carbon dioxide.  Consider purchasing used or refurbished office furniture, as it has already off-gassed harmful chemicals and vapors.

Engage your employees.

The greenest tenant improvements in the world will be ineffective if the building’s occupants aren’t engaged, and whose sustainability goals aren’t aligned with the company’s. How the office is occupied is just as important as how it was built out.   Engage your employees by more than just openly sharing your sustainability plan, but also explaining why certain measures were implemented (i.e. the waterless urinals will save 250k gallons of water this year).  If new technologies have been implemented, explain how to use them.  Reward employees who are proactive in helping the company achieve their sustainability goals.  Make it convenient and easy for employees to recycle.    Provide filtered tap water for employees rather than purchasing water bottles.

Developing a sustainable real estate strategy is really nothing more than developing a smart real estate strategy.  Don’t just “go green” for show, but be sincere in your approach and you will reap the benefits.  The truth is, a green office will yield happier employees while positively impacting your bottom line, so do it right.

Energy Management Apps Any Organization Can Afford

Ashley

By Ashley Halligan, an analyst at Software Advice

As environmental policy, benchmark reporting laws, and a general social awareness become more common practice in day-to-day business practice, new technologies are being designed and implemented by slews of organizations to measure their environmental performance and overall impact. Software developers are designing entire suites centered around benchmarking performance, suggesting upgrades, identifying operational inefficiencies, and even gamifying occupant behavior to encourage compliance with an organization’s goals.

Some organizations may not have the capital to immediately invest in such systems, but still want to get on board with responsible consumption–and identify inefficiencies before they become too problematic or expensive to overcome. For those organizations able to implement full suites dedicated to such features, that’s fantastic. For others, however, there’s a slew of applications seaping into the market, making similar tools available to literally any organization. Addressing everything from holistic energy audits, to measuring air quality, and even providing ENERGY STAR benchmarking, here are two affordable–and one free–application, all organizations should know about.

Recently awarded second place in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Apps for Energy contest, Melon Power was designed following the White House’s Green Button initiative–encouraging energy providers to make consumption data widely available–both residential and commercial–to their customers. At $500 per building, this Web-based application takes Green Button distributed data covering a 12-month benchmarking period, calculates an ENERGY STAR score, then reports that data to the EPA’s Portfolio Manager, in compliance with state laws that have been rolled out thus far.

Another powerful app–ecoInsight Mobile Audit for iPad–performs full energy audits of a building’s performance following user-inputted data collected while doing a thorough walk through. This free application is a powerful tool allowing operators to input operational measurements such as area, space, light wattage, etc. Once a walkthrough is complete, data is uploaded to ecoInsight’s site–where upgrades are suggested and customer proposals can be drafted.

Lastly, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning’s (ASHRAE) offers their HVAC ASHRAE 62.1-2010 for $19.99 which performs ventilation calculations based on user-entered data. This app distinguishes whether a building meets the industry-accepted ASHRAE standard for indoor air quality (IAQ) in commercial spaces. Additionally, given that IAQ is of importance in achieving certain LEED credits, this application can help an operator understand their current benchmark and if improvements need to be made to achieve the necessary credits.

These applications provide a great launching point for organizations wishing to assess and improve performance–whether for legal compliance, LEED certification–or simply, to demonstrate corporate social responsibility and a commitment to environmental performance. Read more about the applications and their features on the Software Advice blog: 3 Energy Management & Environmental Performance Apps Any Organization Can Afford. Feel free to reach out to me via ashley@softwareadvice.com with any suggestions or comments, or leave them below.


Office Towers Made From … Wood?

I’m not going to lie; when I first heard about CREE Buildings and their efforts to erect skyscrapers made from wood, I was more than just a little skeptical. I couldn’t help but recall the story of the Three Little Pigs and the image of the wolf…huffing, puffing, and blowing down the house.

But, seeing is believing.  In November, 2012, CREE Buildings opened its doors to LCT ONE in Dornbirn, Austria – the world’s first 8-story timber hybrid building.  The office tower was built using glulam wood beams as the primary building material and combined with a limited amount of concrete, using a process called the LifeCycle Tower system.  (It took only 8 days to erect 8 stories – check out the time-lapse video below.)


Put simply, they’re scaling the already familiar pre-fab, modular construction model and applying it to industrial office construction to buildings as high as 30 stories.  The benefits of prefabricated construction are many – shorter construction times, reduced construction waste and fewer resources used throughout manufacturing, to name a few.

I caught up with CREE’s CEO, Michael Zangeri, at GreenBuild in San Francisco recently, where he converted me from skeptic to evangelist.

Cree LifeCycle Tower systems deliver tall commercial green buildings, up to 30 stories with 90% fewer C02 emissions, reduced costs, and 50% shorter construction time.

One of my first concerns was related to my perception of wood being more dangerous in a fire than steel.  Well, apparently wood is safer in a fire than its unpredictable counterpart, which can collapse instantly and without warning in high temperatures.  Wood on the other hand has a predictable burning rate.

From a sustainability perspective, wood is just about as an abundant and renewable raw material you can find.  Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of steel and many other building materials.

And what does a skyscraper made from wood look like?  Absolutely nothing like you’d expect.  Aesthetically, they’re gorgeous.  Check out the pics below and see for yourself.

Rose Begonia
rose@technicacommunications.com
(UK) +44 741-474-5238

Lease Structure Key to Energy Savings

When office tenants pay only for their actual energy consumption, they inherently use less of it. Unfortunately, most tenants in “Class A” buildings have a lease structure called “fully-serviced” which does not account for how much energy each individual tenant uses, and therefore doesn’t motivate them to reduce their energy consumption because there’s no economic incentive.

submeter

Leasehold structures can generally fall into one of three categories:

• Triple Net (NNN):  In addition to paying Base Rent, the tenant is billed separately for property taxes, insurance, maintenance charges, utilities and janitorial services.

• Industrial Gross (IG):  All of the above expenses are included in the rental rate, with the exception of utilities and janitorial, which are paid separately by the tenant. This can also be called “Manufacturer’s Gross” (MG) or “Net of Utilities and Janitorial” (NUJ).

• Full-Service (FS):  In this lease structure, the tenant’s rental rate covers all of the above expenses, and is also sometimes referred to as a “Gross Lease”.  Any increases in Operating Expenses “OpEx” are passed through to the tenant as “Additional Rent”.  So for example, if the utility company decides to hike up the cost of their electricity, the tenants get stuck with the bill and pay according to their pro-rata percentage share of how much space they occupy in the building.

Turn off the lights behind you.  One day when you’re paying the bill you won’t forget! – Mom

So here’s the problem.  In a Full-Service lease, the landlord is not incentivized to implement energy-saving measures since they’re passing all increases through to the tenant.  And the tenant has no reason to try and save energy because doing so won’t reduce their monthly rent.

The logical solution is to sub-meter the tenant’s space so that they’re only paying for what they actually consume, and will realize the economic benefit from conserving energy.  This is much easier said than done, however.  Most Class A buildings simply aren’t designed to sub-meter individual tenant spaces, and most tenants do not have the necessary leverage to get the landlord to agree to pull them off the Full-Service lease.

Commercial real estate firm CB Richard Ellis found that separately metered buildings where tenants pay for what they consume, lower their energy costs on average by 21%.

So what do we do in the meantime while we wait for new buildings to be designed that can address this concern and take advantage of the huge opportunity for mass energy reduction in the workplace?  One option is to seek out buildings that already offer leaseholds on an Industrial Gross basis.  Typically you’ll see this in smaller, older buildings with a lower tenant density.  Or, if you are in an office tower and occupy several floors, you may have the necessary leverage to negotiate a lease that’s net of electric and get the landlord to agree to sub-meter your space.

As a broker, I always give preference to buildings that have leases structured as Industrial Gross.  In addition to the obvious benefit of saving money, I think employees appreciate being engaged and knowing that their energy-reducing actions have a positive impact and benefit.